FAULT Interviews: Victoria Summer, who stars as Julie Andrews in ‘Saving Mr Banks’

victoria summer - lace (images by Christos)

FAULT: You play the legendary Julie Andrews in Saving Mr. Banks, what was it like to portray such a popular and well known actress?

Such big boots to fill! It was an honour. She is truly a remarkable woman and as a student of Musical Theater, Julie Andrews is someone I’ve looked up to and admired since I was a child. Of course being on set with Tom Hanks and Emma Thompson was a dream come true. I watched Tom’s career since ‘Big’, and ‘Sense and Sensibility’ and ‘Love Actually’ are two of my favourite movies.

What helped you prepare for such a big role?

I watched the 1964 premiere of Mary Poppins on You Tube. It’s really well covered and I took on board her mannerisms as far as the way she held herself, her mannerisms etc.

You star alongside some great actors; Tom Hanks, Colin Farrell and Emma Thompson to name but a few. Coming into your lead role as a relative newcomer (when set against some of those performers) must have been a daunting experience! Was there any additional pressure on you to prove yourself?

People judge. You just do your best. What is funny to me is that since I cut my hair short, people upon meeting me immediately think I’m a model. I only really earnt substantial money modelling in the last year and a half with my short hair. I started acting and singing really young and I have a degree in acting and Musical Theatre; I studied in London for three years. You just hope people actually look at your body of work and versatility to play any role.

VictoriaS-9818_300dpi_COLOR (images by Christos)

Did it all go smoothly from the start or was it a bit of a learning curve? If the latter, was anyone particularly helpful in terms of helping you find your feet?

A learning curve to say the least! It was not a smooth ride for me. I definitely met people who have influenced my journey, as well as role models whom I’ve never met.

Can you give us some details about the character you play in the upcoming Transformers movie?

I can’t say much on this but I’m the Executive Assistant to Stanley Tucci. Another wonderful actor.

What is Michael Bay like as a director?

He has incredible attention to detail, he’s always several steps ahead and, of course, you can’t deny he knows exactly how to pick beautiful actresses and make them look like movie stars; his shot set-ups and lighting are exquisite. What actress doesn’t want that? I’m a big fan. After all, the proof is in the pudding and the gross statistics of his movies do not lie.

victoria summer - portrait_bw (images by Christos)

Was the move from musical theatre to the big screen an organic change or did you struggle to find your place within this new discipline?

You just stay honest as an actor. There are obvious differences like keeping it all much smaller for camera but you adjust. Actors need to be adaptable. After all, you can get on set and the director could change everything you’d planned. It happens all the time.

You arrived in LA in 2012 and have already found success that some can only dream of. What’s the secret?

Work ethic. I focus on production. I count how much money I make each week, I keep really close touch on that! If I’m making less than the week before, I burn the
midnight oil! I’m a nerd! I look at my successful actions and keep doing them… I’m heavily into self improvement. My family were not in the business – I didn’t get any
foot ups it was all hard work, persistence and determination.

VictoriaS-0198_300dpi (images by Christos)

Photo by Christos

What does the future hold for Victoria Summer? Are you already thinking ahead or are you just concentrating on the present, and Saving Mr Banks, for the time being?

I have big dreams and I always have one foot in the future. Victoria Summer the actress but also the brand. That’s movies, fashion, music and beauty. I really enjoy the
business and I’m very excited to keep expanding.

What is your FAULT?

Do you know that ‘fault’ has fourteen definitions and three idioms in my dictionary?

Definition (1): A defect or imperfection.

My eyes are blue and I have a fleck of brown in my right eye. It’s the first thing my father noticed when I was born. There you go!

Twitter: @VictoriaSummer

Interview by Miles Holder; images by Ricky Middlesworth (unless otherwise stated)

FAULT Reviews: The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

DISCLAIMER: This writer only watched the first Hunger Games film the night before attending the preview screening of the sequel, The Hunger Games: Catching Firehaving missed it in cinemas and somehow dodged the hype . If you have arrived at this review of the sequel uninitiated then watch the first, fantastic, film now.

ID_D20_08568.dng

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire follows Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) and Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) soon after their triumph at the annual death match after which the series is named. The audience had been left in a state of uncertainty – relieved at their joint survival, but also apprehensive at the Capitol’s machinations. But the Games only exist to provide measured hope as a temper for a totalitarian fear; and from a wintry opening scene the regime proceeds to pulverize the former with a heavy-handed enforcement of the latter.

The fact that the two films in this series are, in many ways, fairground mirrors of each other, is reflected in their respective straplines. A direct crossover from the books, the first film’s ‘May the Odds be Ever in Your Favour’ is set against ‘Remember Who the Enemy Is’ in revelatory fashion. The first film establishes background before dwelling extensively on the Games ritual. The sequel, in reflecting on the widening fractures, personal and societal, that threaten to unbalance an unnatural status quo, targets the true enemy in the fictional world of Panem.

Catching Fire 1

Katniss’ first battle in the arena is seen originally as a heroic fight against the cruel establishment: by taking the actions she does, we are led to believe that hers is a direct fight against the unjust hierarchy of Panem. By contrast, The Hunger Games: Catching Fire gradually unveils the levels of a deeply embedded dystopia, and the increasingly drastic measures it will take to preserve the illusion of a benevolent dictatorship.

Although the Games remain a horror to the characters, the audience begins to question whether the Game itself is any more dangerous than the world of escalating brutality that lies beyond the dome. Katniss’s dream of escape from the system – apparently promised by her victory in the first film – begins to die with the realisation that she can only lose while its authority is accepted; instead she and her allies must reject, and utterly shatter, the rules that confine them.

Catching Fire 3

When put together, the two films are cleverly constructed – that much is undeniable. The narrative arc of the first film reflects that of the sequel, albeit in an almost horribly inverted fashion. Where the brutal day to day grind of life in District 12 is seen as nightmarish in the first film, here it is almost seen as an escape from the unmentionable horrors of the Games arena. Similarly, where the first film presented the journey to the Capitol as a fleeting flirtation with fame and fortune – albeit one that the protagonists, knowing what was to come, never really bought into – here it is revealed as a descent into horror.

ID_D13_05238.dng

Elizabeth Banks as Effie is impeccable

Against this grimmer backdrop the audience meets an even bigger supporting cast: all of them walking clichés at heart, but so vivified by the acting behind them that it doesn’t matter. Some have returned to us even better than before. Elizabeth Banks as Effie is impeccable; Woody Harrelson creates depth for mentor figure Haymitch with finesse; and President Snow (Donald Sutherland) becomes ever more disquieting as he steps out from the background. And of course Caesar (Stanley Tucci), Cinna (Lenny Kravitz) and many more once again bring Panem to life.

Foremost among the newcomers is Philip Seymour Hoffman, precise as the manipulative games master Plutarch. Sam Claflin performs well as returning tribute Finnick, and the brief scenes for Johanna (Jena Malone) and peace officer Romulus Thread (Patrick St. Esprit) were a pleasure. Sadly, this film is too crowded to continue singing their praises – and often the few glimpsed promises were just that. On the other hand The Hunger Games: Catching Fire continues to intrigue the audience with longevity and friend/foe guessing games, and this writer got caught out until the last few scenes.

ID_D13_04918.dng

Philip Seymour Hoffman (right) is precise as the manipulative games master Plutarch

The problem with The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, as the second act in a quadrilogy, is its self awareness. Director Francis Lawrence‘s deconstruction of the dystopia oversteps the mark of what one can achieve in a limited time frame (even though this film is still over 2 hours long). The original introduces the protagonists, the Games and the people at the heart of the insanity; the sequel tries to delve into that and expand on the world of Panem. Where the original has a strong narrative and ends in a satisfying resolution, the sequel is essentially a lengthy set-up for what is to come. Whether intentional or not, the overall mood becomes disjointed.

Although the film brings many of the same positives – among them beautiful visuals, excellent scene building and subtly visceral combat – it also suffers much more seriously from a burgeoning amount of material to cover. Between the drama, tense action and the racing, but sometimes predictable, plot, the audience is overburdened with emotional demands. Lawrence and Hutcherson are great in their roles, but have particularly suffered in this film. Their characters’ personal struggles, and Katniss’s conflict with the all-too-obvious destiny laid out for her, stretch any initial anticipation or interest thin.

ID_D15_06219.dng

President Snow (Donald Sutherland) becomes ever more disquieting as he steps out from the background

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire has to be judged as part of an ongoing series. Ultimately it is a well made and a thoroughly entertaining watch, but relies on the strength of the original Hunger Games and the promise of more to come. If we had to recommend either of the films as a stand-alone thenwe would likely chose the first. But then, how could you watch either and make a conscious decision not to hunt down the other immediately?

Make no mistake – we’re already looking forward to The Hunger Games part 3.

 

Words by Charles Conway
Edit by Nick Artsruni